[Fetuses born lifeless: new representations and new rights]. / Corps des foetus mort-nés : nouvelles représentations et nouveaux droits.

A february-2008 rule about << children born lifeless >> stressed that << every fetus born lifeless >> could be registered at the General Register Office. This rule, which was followed in 2009 by the implementation of new procedures to deal with dead fetuses, highlighted that this topic is more and more becoming an important public issue. The rights for parents to choose has now been recognized, bringing about new questions for health professionals. Another point is which symbolism is to be given to dead fetuses to alleviate couples' suffering, without being too ideological, i.e. seeing fetuses as persons. This change also makes professionals reconsider public health system priorities, and this at a very particular time. Indeed, as parent mourning has now been made easier through registration at the General Register Office, there has not been any rule yet linking national epidemiological registration and fetal death in France. double dagger.

Information and decision-making process for selective termination of dichorionic pregnancies: some French obstetricians' points of view.

BACKGROUND: In France, neither Bioethics Law nor law related to abortion make reference to selective terminations (ST). Because they apply in the context of multiple pregnancies, ST raises problems which differ from those we usually see in prenatal medicine.We wanted to know: 1) which approaches were used by obstetricians to inform couples about processes and risks of ST, 2) their role in the decision-making process of couples, and 3) their representations about the level of autonomy that couples are able to assume. METHODS: Qualitative research, eight semi-structured interviews performed with eight obstetricians from seven public hospitals in Parisian region. RESULTS: Similarities: *Necessity to devote a lot of time to information. *Importance to give the couples the maximum of time for reflection. *Belief that the final decision belongs to couples. Discordances: *Heterogeneity of revealed information. *Discrepancy in the will to assure a complete and non directive information transfer. *Divergence in representations of what is an ethical support. *Differences in the limits of the autonomy of couples. CONCLUSIONS: All physicians believe that they respect the autonomy of couples, arguing that final decision belongs to them. Paradoxically, some results are indicative of a sizeable level of directiveness from the physicians.